| Some Questions | ||||
|
|
||||
|
I
have often been asked by customers whether a modded DVDP can sound as good
as a stand-a-lone CDP which they have.
My answer is a definite yes. Why?
Because it
is the electronics and engineering inside your player that makes music,
not the marketing. Electronics against electronics, some DVD players packs better electronics than stand-a-lone CDPs. It is often the implementation that let the DVDP down in a shootout. Let me explain it in greater detail below:
|
||||
|
Some Facts |
||||
|
Given the economies of scale between mass-consumer manufacturers like Philips/Sony/Pioneer/Denon that produces tens of thousands of DVD players per month vs specialized hifi manufacturers that are happy to hit 5Kpcs a year, the cost to produce a disc spinner between the two are extremely different. Also, given that the mass-consumer guys enjoys volume of sales and greater distribution channels, they are able to make do with a lower percentage profit per player than a specialized HiFi manufacturer.
|
||||
|
Some Problems |
||||
|
Unfortunately, good core electronics alone does not ultimately translate to good sound. The implementation and engineering aspect is also very important. 1.
Using a low cost noisy
switch-mode power supply to run the analog sections.
Linear power supplies are heavy and expensive to implement for the
mass-consumer guys. As a
result you only get to see linear power supplies in top of the line mass
consumer players like : Yamaha DVP2300, Denon A11, A1 and DVD5910, not
mention the likes of specialist Hifi.
With my installation, this critical upgrade will be available to
you at a fraction of the price of the above players
2. Using a high quality low jitter clock. Even though a low jitter clock brings about measurable audio and video performance, their high cost prohibits everyone (specialist hifi and mass consumer guys alike) from using them freely. As a result, you only get to see mentioned of a low jitter clock in the flagship players of a mass consumer manufacturer. 3. Using peripheral components like caps, resistors and opamps, which just manage to pass the required technical specification of the player designed in mind. Of
the above, some gives measurable improvements, in which case the specs of
the player designed would be loosen to accommodate the drop in performance
by using the lower spec part, (after all, the specs of a player is defined
by them ;) not you
|
||||
|
Some Remedies |
||||
|
Armed
with the above insight, what would the smart consumer (you
|
||||
|
Some Modder |
||||
|
At
Effective Audio, we pride ourselves by the services and value we create
for the customer. Below are
some of the points which we believe really gives us an edge: Total Transparency You really know what you will be getting for your mods, as we disclose what we have done to your player in our player’s archives. You will know what you are getting for your money. No mumbo jumbo snake oil stuffs from us. |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
Absolutely Enjoyable
and Effective
As a classically trained
musician who is still actively involved in the local music scene, the
accurate representation of instrument timbre and most importantly the
musicality of my modded players is extremely important.
Often for new player mods, it takes me up to 2 weeks to fine-tune the
sound to my satisfaction. Do
take my words for it. Read what my
customers have to say
|
||||
|
Some Player |
||||
|
There
are some players out there that are absolute gems and are really very very
good after mods, as well as being reliable to last a long time too after
mods
If
you are having these players and is thinking of “upgrading” for better
audio and video, DON”T. Instead
spend on modding these equipments and you will not regret
I
do have most of these available for home loans for your comparisons so as
to help you get a better picture how the modded player will sound and see
after the mods
|
||||
-------- Pioneer --------Pioneer 655 A gem of a player. Virtually same audio chipset as the Pioneer 755ai. Same top end DAC and SACD decoder, as well as the same MPEG decoder. For audio, just that it uses lower grade caps and opamps. The board is the same as the 755ai. Only problem is that the small space makes installing linear power supply very difficult (but still possible). Should be able to find used ones in the market for around S$200~300 Pioneer
755ai An
improvement on the 655, with the IEEE1394 audio digital output for SACD and
DVD, as well as an Motorola DSP I think to implement the legato link audio
post-processing. Also has very
good mechanical chasis, which is very rigid.
Has better peripheral parts like opamps and capacitors than the 655,
but the same DAC and SACD decoder. Internal
space is bigger, so the installation of a linear power supply is easy Pioneer 667A Very interesting player and adsolute bargain. Uses the same grade ST MPEG decoder and the same Philips Furore2 SACD decoder as the Philips 963sa. Has a top grade burr-brown DAC too. Target of repackaged mods by Hifi Companies like Trichord and Ayre. Only problem is that internally it is very small, so the installing of the linear power supply has to be external. Can be found S$200~300 used.
|
||||
-------- Philips --------Philips 963sa
What can I say? I
am part of the design team for this player
|
||||
|
-------- Denon -------- Denon 2900 Very good DVD drive and mechanical constructions. Denon probably has the best mechanical constructions around. Absolutely bomb proof and set the standard at the price range. With top-end DAC and SACD decoder. Can be found S$500~600 used. Denon 3910 This player, not the Denon 2910, is the successor to the above player. Features an even better drive and PCB, it improves upon the Denon 2900 is subtle yet correct way J Same top end DAC and SACD decoder and excellent video boards. Denon A11 Denon’s Previous flagship. With linear power supply for both audio and video that is the fundamental for this player’s excellent audio and visual performance. The Denon 3910 is actually based heavily on this player. Flagship class construction and parts used.
|
||||
|
effectiveaudiomod.com (C) 2005 |
||||